<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Brooks&#039; Reply to the Single Site / Multi Site Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andysweet.com/2008/04/chris-brooks-reply-to-the-single-site-multi-site-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andysweet.com/2008/04/chris-brooks-reply-to-the-single-site-multi-site-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:38:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Giveaway Competition</title>
		<link>http://andysweet.com/2008/04/chris-brooks-reply-to-the-single-site-multi-site-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Giveaway Competition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andysweet.com/2008/04/18/chris-brooks-reply-to-the-single-site-multi-site-debate/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] conversations with about traffic generation possibilities is Chris Brooks. He&#8217;s written some very insightful comments on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conversations with about traffic generation possibilities is Chris Brooks. He&#8217;s written some very insightful comments on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave matson</title>
		<link>http://andysweet.com/2008/04/chris-brooks-reply-to-the-single-site-multi-site-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>dave matson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andysweet.com/2008/04/18/chris-brooks-reply-to-the-single-site-multi-site-debate/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Excellent discussion. I can&#039;t get enough ROI talk! Really... I can&#039;t.

I think it makes perfect sense, as Chris suggests, to make small steps up the site quality ladder with promising domains.

And to whatever degree you can experiment quickly and cheaply to determine what sites have the most potential, and cull the winners from the losers - that&#039;s incredibly valuable information.

I&#039;m all for a broader discussion about tools to leverage quick and semi-dirty content development. I always have more ideas than I have the time or technical knowledge to easily implement, so the biggest challenge is often in prioritizing what to focus on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent discussion. I can&#8217;t get enough ROI talk! Really&#8230; I can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I think it makes perfect sense, as Chris suggests, to make small steps up the site quality ladder with promising domains.</p>
<p>And to whatever degree you can experiment quickly and cheaply to determine what sites have the most potential, and cull the winners from the losers &#8211; that&#8217;s incredibly valuable information.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for a broader discussion about tools to leverage quick and semi-dirty content development. I always have more ideas than I have the time or technical knowledge to easily implement, so the biggest challenge is often in prioritizing what to focus on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

