<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parked Domains SEO Ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andysweet.com/2008/04/parked-domains-seo-ranking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andysweet.com/2008/04/parked-domains-seo-ranking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:38:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://andysweet.com/2008/04/parked-domains-seo-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andysweet.com/2008/04/02/parked-domains-seo-ranking/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Interesting!

So either
1) the filter/restriction on ranking parked domains isn&#039;t quite so absolute, and you can slip in a domain for a not-so-competitive phrase with the right title &amp; domain, or
2) this guy is doing something extra clever or different that google isn&#039;t currently catching

I&#039;m a total n00b at this, but my probably wrong opinion is that it&#039;s #1. I&#039;ve occasionally seen inadvertently parked domains rank for phrases in the domain name. I think I&#039;ve even done it myself by failing to redirect a domain properly.

I suspect that they could be a lag time in which google gives some credit for the site that &quot;used to be there&quot; if the domain had enough prior credibility, backlinks, etc.

But It looks like this one expired last year, so that is a pretty long time for the domain to maintain that credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!</p>
<p>So either<br />
1) the filter/restriction on ranking parked domains isn&#8217;t quite so absolute, and you can slip in a domain for a not-so-competitive phrase with the right title &amp; domain, or<br />
2) this guy is doing something extra clever or different that google isn&#8217;t currently catching</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a total n00b at this, but my probably wrong opinion is that it&#8217;s #1. I&#8217;ve occasionally seen inadvertently parked domains rank for phrases in the domain name. I think I&#8217;ve even done it myself by failing to redirect a domain properly.</p>
<p>I suspect that they could be a lag time in which google gives some credit for the site that &#8220;used to be there&#8221; if the domain had enough prior credibility, backlinks, etc.</p>
<p>But It looks like this one expired last year, so that is a pretty long time for the domain to maintain that credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

